Showing posts with label UAV. Show all posts

China Expands Drone Surveillance Near Indian Border




High above the snowy peaks of the Himalayas, it was but a sparkling light.The unidentified object was, however, bright enough to catch the attention of officers of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) force, who were on a recent patrol in the difficult high terrain along India’s disputed mountainous border with China.The bright speck, they knew, was out of place among the gently flickering stars that usually keep them company on cold night patrols.

The ITBP and military experts believe the sighting was only the latest confirmation of a military programme across the border that is revolutionising China’s surveillance capabilities — the country’s fast-expanding domestic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), or “drone”, industry.

Posted in , , | Leave a comment

Elbit Unveils New Generational UAV Command And Control Center




Elbit Systems says it has successfully flight-tested its Hermes 450 and Hermes 900 unmanned aerial vehicles from one ground control station, greatly enhancing the operational flexibility of the long-range drones amid a growing global market for the aircraft.

The tests underlined how Israel's high-tech defense industry is developing a wide range of unmanned robot systems for air, land and sea. These include Nahshson, a remote-controlled land vehicle that can tote 2 tons of cargo.

This is an advanced variant of the Guardium robot vehicle developed by G-NIUS Unmanned Ground Systems, a joint venture by Elbit and state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries. The Guardium has been in operated by the Israeli military since 2008.

Elbit said the Hermes tests were conducted from the company's new universal ground control station using a single operator for both UAVs.
"Joint flight control and management of two different unmanned aircraft systems provides users with enhanced operational flexibility, adapting each UAS to a specific mission and enabling management of highly complex missions in diverse arenas," Elbit said.

The Hermes 450 is a tactical long-endurance UAV that is the backbone of the Israeli air force's drone fleet, with more than 200,000 operational flight hours.

It's capable of flying at altitudes up to 20,000 feet. The latest variant is quieter than its predecessors and carries a heavier payload.
The Hermes 900 has longer endurance, a silenced engine, a maximum altitude of 30,000 feet and a larger payload capacity of 770 pounds.
Israel's defense industry has become a major producer of UAVs, along with the United States.

According to Jacques Chemia, chief engineer of IAI's UAV division, "Israel is the world's leading exporter of drones, with more than 1,000 sold in 42 countries."

Under a ground-breaking April 2009 contract with Moscow, worth $53 million, IAI, flagship of Israel's defense industry, sold Russia 12 short-range Bird-Eye 400, I-View MK150 and long-range Searcher II UAVs.

It was Russia's first purchase of a foreign weapons system and emphasized its technology shortfall following the sharp reduction of spending on research and development in the 1990s when the Cold War ended.
That contract led to a $400 million deal between IAI and Russia's Oboronprom OPK Group in October under which the Russians will eventually manufacture the Heron 1, one of Israel's most advanced UAVs capable of strategic missions.

IAI has developed the more advanced Heron TP, dubbed the Eitan which is Hebrew for "Strong."

This long-range UAV weight 4.5 tons, has a wingspan of 86 feet -- about that same as a Boeing 737 airliner -- and can stay aloft for 20 hours at high altitude.

This unique UAV, a major technological breakthrough for the Israelis, has a 1,200 horsepower turbojet, a maximum altitude of 40,000 feet and can carry hundreds of pounds of equipment, such as high-resolution cameras, electronic surveillance systems and presumably weapons.

The Heron TP is capable of reaching Iran, although it's not known whether it has done so on surveillance missions, or whether it can be refueled in air.
The Hermes 900 is also reported to be able to reach Iran.
The ground-based robot systems are now widely deployed with the Israeli military. The Guardium has notched up thousands of operational hours since 2008.

The Nahshon, the latest UGV being developed by UGS, is able to operate on its own in combat zones. The Nahshon team believes it is close to producing a completely autonomous guidance system for the cargo vehicle.
Guardium and other UGVs are used to reinforce the remote-controlled gun and sensor towers or patrol areas along Israel's borders with troubled Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.

Amid the upheaval in Egypt that toppled President Hosni Mubarak, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu ordered the construction of a security barrier along a 90-mile stretch of the border with Egypt to be speeded up.
This, originally intended to keep out illegal African immigrants, could have remote-control guard towers as well and be patrolled by UGVs.
Over recent years, the Israeli military has automated much of its security along the Lebanese and Gaza borders.

This includes the Sentry-Tech armored watchtowers, 15 feet high and 6 feet in diameter, that are topped with remote-control machine gun turrets and night-vision video cameras. The latest addition is radar that can penetrate fog.

Posted in | 1 Comment

Indian Army Get 4 Indigenously Nishant Unmanned Aerial Vehicles UAV's.

  

After completing successful flight trials in Rajasthan, Indian Army recently took delivery of four indigenously designed and developed 'Nishant' Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV).

"Nishant has successfully completed the series of confirmatory trials conducted by the Indian Army at Chandan Range in Pokharan recently before (the Army) taking delivery of a set of four UAVs together with ground systems," DRDO officials said here.


To be used for battle-field reconnaissance in day and night, surveillance, target tracking and correction of artillery fire, the DRDO-developed UAV can also be utilised for anti-insurgency operations.


The electro optical, electronic intelligence and communication intelligence payload on-board the UAV make it suitable for a range of operations both during wartime and counter insurgency operations, they said.


The Nishant is capable of being launched from a hydro pneumatic launcher, without the need of a runway. The UAV can be controlled by 'Ground Control Systems' mounted on Tatra vehicles, DRDO distinguished scientist Prahlada said.


With an endurance level of four and a half hours, Nishant is designed for safe recovery from a desired place with the help of parachutes.


Along with the regiments which would be operating the UAVs, the confirmatory flight of the UAV were witnessed by the Director General of artillery Lt General Vinod Nayanar and Director of Aeronautical Development Agency P S Krishnan.


Nishant has been designed and developed by DRDO's Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE), which specialises in developing UAVs, flight control systems and simulators in association with other labs.

Posted in , | Leave a comment

Turkey’s First Indigenous MALE-class Anka UAV Takes To the Skies

  



Turkey’s first national MALE-class (medium altitude long endurance) unmanned aerial vehicle, dubbed “Anka” after an Anatolian bird, made its maiden flight without much of a publicity just before the New Year’s Day, TRDEFENCE sources reported on Sunday.
Anka is vastly superior to its competition (such as the Heron of Israeli origin) in the same category thanks to its heavier payload capacity, long flight time of 24 hours, higher flight ceiling and state-of-the-art electrooptical instruments that include Aselsan’s next-generation AselFLIR 300T, laser target designator and an indigenously developed synthetic aperture radar (SAR) that can detect, identify and track targets day and night, beyond thick layers of cloud, dust and smoke.
Anka also carries on-board artificial intelligence that enables the aircraft to fly autonomously without the requirement for remote human assistance, find allied airbases in the event of an emergency and land automatically.


An armed version of the aircraft, codenamed Anka-B, is currently under development in Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) with further funding from Turkey’s Undersecretariat for Defence Industries, SSM. Reports indicate that Anka-B’s modular weapons architecture will be able to carry Roketsan-developed Cirit laser guided rockets, UMTAS anti-tank missiles and/or other compatible weapon systems depending on the assigned mission.

Anka features low radar observatibility courtesy of its thin profile, carbon composite structures that minimize the usage of highly reflective metal components as well as its aerodynamically efficient design.
The first Anka is expected to be commissioned by TurAF in 2011 with the armed Anka-B following it up in 2013.

Posted in , | Leave a comment

UCAVs: The Future of Air Warfare For PAF

Courtesy::Grandstrategy



The Indian Air Force is projected to induct a large number of 5th generation fighter aircraft within the timeframe of 2025. This poses serious challenges for the numerically smaller Pakistan Air Force (PAF). The paper suggests UCAVs as a possible solution in countering India’s military aviation threat to Pakistan. Pakistan can develop UCAVs in the same manner they developed the JF-17. The argument is in favor of UCAVs to supplement 4th generation fighters and enumerates an active and specific solution for PAF.
Introduction:

Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles (UCAVs) are a category of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) that are designed to fire munitions and are characterized by increased autonomy of operation. Key attributes coupled with UCAVs, as defined in conventional military jargon, include an unmanned counterpart of a manned attack or fighter aircraft. This necessitates such capabilities as range, high speeds and a significant weapon load. Another key salient of UCAVs is the broad requirement for UCAVs to survive engagements rather than be used in one-way kamikaze strikes. UCAVs operational today are largely restricted to small, lightly armed derivatives of more conventional UAVs.[1]

UCAVs are an emerging technology that has the potential to revolutionize air warfare. While the 5th generation of combat planes today is the pinnacle of military aviation, UCAVs present paradigms that can supplement if not supplant them. Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) who discuss a potential 6th generation inevitably mention unmanned aircraft as a possible key salient.[2]




This paper focuses on UCAVs in a function as air-to-air combat vehicles focused on air superiority missions. The paper is in exclusion of other roles such as air-to-ground and Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance (ISR). It is recognized that UAVs are highly effective in both these roles and this exclusion in no way implies the belittlement of these key aspects to UCAV and UAV technology.

The paper considers the advantages, disadvantages, technology and politics and how this relates to Pakistan and her threat perception. It offers a specific solution tailored for the Subcontinent.

The Advantages of UCAVs

Long Range Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Combat

The world is increasingly converging towards long range air-to-air combat, not only with increasingly sophisticated radars[3] that negate stealth[4], but also AAMs like the ASRAAM and the A-Darter that provide an improvement in range of IR-based missiles (Defense Industry Daily, 2010). Pilots engaged in BVR combat perhaps have the least value added to combat; essentially, they monitor their sensor-suite, communicate with controllers and then fire a missile which then takes over the task of actually destroying the target. An F-pole style maneuver or other similar maneuvers are limited by the G-forces that the pilots can sustain. Dodging incoming BVR missiles, fired from enemy aircraft is again limited by the G-forces the pilot can handle. The case for a UCAV in this form of combat is arguably the strongest after ISR. 


Short Range within Visual Range Combat:

To consider WVR combat, let us visualize what is achievable with the state-of-the-art at present in the form of the F-35. We will later consider how much better a UCAV can exploit these advantages than a manned pilot.

In a post-merge scenario where a large number of friendly and enemy aircraft are embroiled in a dogfight, identifying friend-or-foe and firing at a target can become both critical and yet complicated. When a fraction of a second counts, the human pilot has to analyze his MMI and make a quick choice. The F-35 helps this critical process by providing an MMI that keeps track of all aircraft embroiled in the fight and displaying them in the most user-friendly method possible.

The process sounds difficult, but is only so for a human. A computer can analyze aircraft shapes easily. Situational awareness, whether human or computer-enabled, allows a fighter aircraft to assign missiles for targets as soon as a picture of the battle-space has been formed. With HOBS missiles, the execution is relatively simple even for a less maneuverable combat aircraft.

Another element added by the F-35 is interconnectivity or swarm logic. Once situational awareness has been achieved by man or machine and the fighter aircraft knows where the friends or foes are, and at the same time can communicate with the rest of the friendly fighter aircraft who also share the same picture of the battle-space, computers can execute complex plays in a team format. This creates a veritable soccer match were one side knows exactly what is going on in the entire football field and the location of its players. As a result, they can significantly outplay the opposing team. Such strategies may include providing cover fire, cross fires, gambits and other game-theory based plays[5]. All such maneuvers can take place pre-programmed and at speeds, G-forces and time frames not possible by human operators. Swarm tactics have already been demonstrated by US aircraft manufacturers in their UCAV programs (Jaquish, 2004). 

Can a human operator compete? Kasparov may or may not be able to beat Deep Blue on a given day. However, to do so while sitting in a fighter cockpit, facing G-forces and in the time constraint of fractions of a second, the victor becomes all too obvious.

Human operators can always be put in the loop where necessary, but a UCAV can easily handle many tasks autonomously, and like an attack dog, only need to be pointed at the enemy. The UCAV can take off, fly a designated route, destroy targets and awaiting instruction or flying back to base, dodging missiles and being fully aware of many factors pilots often forget – being aware of status of weapons, fuel supply, location of enemies and friendly forces, ground units and whether weapons doors are open or closed. It can think of all this simultaneously and do so without mistakes, under any amount of stress, either physical or sensory.

Low Costs:

UCAVs can be manufactured and operated at a tiny fraction of the cost of manned fighters. Quality pilots are a rare commodity and are hard to find, train and keep operationally ready. They also take a considerable amount of lead-time to train effectively. Another aspect is the low maintenance and operational costs due to not having a requirement to constantly fly aircraft. This also means that many important systems do not need to be as reliable or have high MTBF (Mean Time Before Failure). After all, if the UCAV is not endangering a pilot’s life, does not fly frequently and is cheap to manufacture, they need not be as durable. UCAVs need only be flown during wartime or during high tension periods.

This means that their subsystems can be built more cheaply, a key cost element particularly in combat aircraft engine technology. However, some caution needs to be placed as to how far reliability can be compromised as this can be a double-edged sword with accidents and mishaps also effecting costs (Lewis, 2002).

UCAVs may also be cheaper because many expensive elements in a modern fighter relate to the pilot. For instance, cockpit glass is an exceedingly expensive item. Ejection seats, life support systems, cockpit avionics and targeting systems and the sheer space, bulk and weight savings all go to make UCAVs significantly cheaper than manned alternatives[6].

Due to modern network centric warfare, not all UCAVs need have sensors. Expensive AESA radars for instance can be avoided in but a few aircraft within a “pack”. These can often be a manned fighter that orchestrates the package, perhaps preferably a twin-seater, or even be managed by ground controllers / radars or airborne AWACS.

A small UCAV built from an existing parts bin of spare parts can lower costs significantly. We shall discuss further about this aspect later in the paper.

Quantity versus Quality:

Most nations including the United States and China are increasingly fielding sharply smaller quantities of later generation fighters because of the cost and complexity. UCAVs can be produced cheaply, at a small fraction of the cost of modern fighters and can be mass produced for war. As Joseph Stalin once said, quantity has a quality all its own. As modern 5th generation aircraft increasingly resemble flying Tiger tanks, a cheap, simple solution may just prove be the equivalent T-34 equivalent in modern warfare.

Kamikaze:


UCAVs can go into combat disregarding whether they need to come back or not. While fighter pilots may have similar patriotism, operationally air forces for moral and morale reasons prefer to have an exit strategy unless in the most extreme of circumstances. UCAVs make kamikaze strategies practical not only during desperate phases of the war but viable from Day 1. In BVR combat, this becomes an interesting aspect as there is always a tradeoff between the distance a fighter shoots its missile from (and thus how effective this shot will be), and how likely the plane is to come back intact. 

This proposition is even more tenable because UCAVs may prove to be significantly cheaper than their manned enemies and the tradeoff would favor the UCAV operator. Most vitally, UCAVs employing such tactics would have a drastic impact on the enemy’s psychology. The Rand Corporation expresses this doctrine best in the following words:
Aerospace power will tend to perform best when the desired outcome involves affecting adversary behavior rather than seizing and holding terrain.
-RAND Corporation


The Disadvantages of UCAVs


Tackling the Problem of Jamming:

One of the first responses to proposals for UCAVs is whether they will be able to communicate in the event of jamming by the enemy. When we discuss UCAVs, we often have the image of a Predator operator sitting in some trailer guiding the plane and wonder what would happen to the Predator if that link was lost. The first element to consider is that today’s Air-to-Ground based UAVs such as the Predator need a high proportion of the human element because of the vagaries of today’s COIN and CAS operations. High bandwidth data transfer such as video streaming is assumed to be an integral part of UAV operation. This does not have to be true for UCAVs. Identifying friend-or-foe can be significantly easier in an air-to-air battle, particularly with mature IFF technologies. This is true particularly in a Pakistan-India scenario, where the direction of enemy inbound fighters is well known and the environment is best described as sensor rich.


The end result is that, a highly autonomous UCAV will not need constant connectivity but will need to be assigned a task and given instructions for post-task completion. For instance, if after destroying enemy aircraft no other enemy aircraft are found in the vicinity and no instructions are forthcoming from friendly forces, the UCAV may simply be programmed to return to base. In case of fear of electronic warfare incapacitating or overriding the UCAV, a controller may pre-program the UCAV to not accept signals from a specified time period forward. To accomplish the given mission and either go back to base or move to a specific geographical area deep inside Pakistani territory and receive specific directional signals for further instructions.


In this scenario, a UCAV can still be jammed from being operationally effective, but manned aircraft will suffer to the same extent as the UCAV. Even a 5th generation aircraft without AWACS or other auxiliary support will be vulnerable. Another point is that modern communications, even Link 16 is exceedingly hard to jam. Directional communication links are also increasingly mature and near ideal for UCAV use.


Human Element:

Despite all the advantages of a UCAV, the human element cannot be fully substituted, whether one with Artificial Intelligence (AI-UCAV) or a more conventional model. There will always be an opportunity for a fighter pilot to think outside the box. This will continue to remain a weakness of UCAVs. Carlo Kopp mentions the two ideological extremes in UCAV literature, one looking at UCAVs as a “dumb RPV” while the other trying to build a James Cameron’s “Terminator” and suggests a moderate approach between them may be most appropriate (Kopp, 2001).


Reasons Why the West is Being Held Back


Their Politics:

Many technology choices made by the United States and her allies are not based on merit alone but are made because of political reasons. USAF officers for instance, would not like UAVs to take over jobs of their pilots. An example is the Congressional deadline for the USAF to field a third of its force as UAVs by 2010 (Jaquish, 2004). The USAF considered a Predator that can fire its own missile a bad idea and this was not overturned until the CIA used them with great success. Even when forced to fly UAVs, they have insisted on using pilots to fly the UAVs. The US Army proved otherwise when they began using NCOs instead. Another glaring example of the organizational hubris of the US armed services is in their Joint Vision 2020. There is not one mention of UAVs or UCAVs, nor a single picture of one in a paper that has over 50 images of tanks, submarines, fighter jets, warships, transports and refugee camps[7]. William Lewis (Lewis, 2002) also complains about the long lead times in acquisition and procurement within the US armed services.


This bias in the USAF and perhaps in other Western air forces is a key reason for why UAVs in general and UCAVs in particular, have not made breakthroughs in the scale anticipated with technologies now available. History has shown that it often takes a major shock in the form of a war to change perceptions, as was seen in WWI, WWII and to a lesser extent the subsequent wars up to Gulf War II. What we do know is that the people closest to knowing the feasibility of technology in building operational UCAVs are putting their money in this technology. Boeing, Northrop Grumman and General Atomics have spent their own hard cash in researching and developing new UCAVs without formal requests or interest from the USAF.


The Technology behind UCAVs


The technology for fielding real UCAVs has many critical areas that are already proven and mature. Many of the technologies are in fact only waiting to be integrated together. Consider the example of autopilot computers that can now takeoff, fly to a destination and land a commercial aircraft. This technology is operational in the commercial airline industry and is considered mature today. Pilots can merely take control when something untoward happens and requires out-of-the-box thinking.


An American Global Hawk today can take off, fly around the world, accomplish its ISR mission and come back to base making a perfect landing, with no manual input. A JSF is being designed with the ability to visually track a large number of targets, identify and categorize them without any human input. Modern missiles can defeat maneuvering fighters by employing multiple tactics, even being able to come back in case it missed the designated aircraft in its first pass. Again, all this is accomplished without input from a human.


Diffusion of Technology Worldwide:

The technology to build manned fighter aircraft has traditionally remained within a handful of nations such as Russia, USA, China, France, Sweden and the United Kingdom. This monopoly of technology has been a major issue particularly vis-à-vis the West and the Rest of the World. UAV and UCAV technology on the other hand, has been far more diffused throughout the world. Smaller countries and countries with little previous record of aircraft manufacture, such as Israel, Austria, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Switzerland, Turkey, among others are making significant contributions. For instance, Camcopter, a product by a small, hitherto unknown Austrian company Siebel, has sold a large number of its UAVs including over 80 to the UAE (Wezeman, 2007). What is even more interesting is that a number of parts will be manufactured by such an unknown as the UAE Research and Technology Center. It may also be noted that even within the US military-industrial complex, it is General Atomics as opposed to Boeing or Lockheed Martin that has stolen the lead. From these examples and a number of others, the technology behind UCAVs is realizable by firms outside of the traditional countries and corporations that had earlier dominated military aviation. The UAV industry is by all indications Schumpeterian and remains wide open to any country or company.


Golden Opportunity to Pull Ahead:

If the Pakistan Air Force can do better and avoid institutional and political barriers that the West is plagued with, they can make a relative leap in capabilities and meet their goals and objectives far better than a linear and asymmetric solution could. Pakistan has achieved a significant milestone with the JF-17. With a UCAV, Pakistan will have achieved the next major milestone. Pakistan’s aircraft manufacturing industry would remain relevant rather than become outdated and relegated to obsolescence. Pakistan does not have the technology or the resources to build an expensive and complex 5th generation plane. A UCAV however, is a far more achievable goal. As we shall see later, the technologies involved allow far greater flexibility and can be said almost ideally suited to Pakistan’s military-industrial complex’s strengths.


Pakistan’s Threat Scenario 2025


Before considering an active solution and the technologies relevant to that solution, it may be helpful to first consider the threat scenario for Pakistan. A 15 year forward plan may be relevant to our discussion. This is based on the perceived change in the quality of the threat in Pakistan’s neighborhood in that timeframe and allocates time to field a response for Pakistan’s aeronautical industries.


India will begin to field PAKFA fighter jets from Russia and may also develop her own from technology bought from the Russians. While the latter may be discounted as another employment opportunity for DRDO and related third-rate Indian bureaucracies, PAKFA and any specific design built for India by the Russians will provide a challenge that would be wholly new to the subcontinent: a 5th generation fighter. Further, it may not be farfetched to imagine a JSF purchase for the IAF, given the blossoming long-term partnership developing between India and the United States.


While the credentials for the JSF are still unclear and the jury may be out on its air-to-air combat capabilities, the PAKFA is a clear threat. The PAKFA was designed to counter the F-22 in air combat. The threat is perhaps best defined as reasonable stealth, super cruise, high altitude and high speed. The PAKFA takes BVR combat to a new level that the airframe of the JF-17, by design, cannot compete with. BVR missiles launched from a high-high profile aids missile range and speed, and reduces the threat, range and effectiveness of Pakistani BVR launches in response. With AWACs and refuelers in the sky, such threats would be a menace, particularly with longer ranged BVR missiles from Russia.


A major political and geo-strategic to consider is the War on Terror (WOT) in Afghanistan may be winding down by then and aid from the United States and other Western countries are likely to dry up. Pakistan’s Afghanistan leverage vis-à-vis the international community could be drastically reduced. In a worst case scenario, sanctions may once again be imposed in one form or another.


By 2025, India could field PAKFAs and perhaps even JSFs in the hundreds, drastically changing the military balance in the Subcontinent. Pakistan can either go bankrupt attempting to counter this new threat or she can become obsolete, back to a decade similar to the 1990s. Or Pakistan can develop UCAVs.


In the next section of this paper we consider UCAVs as a solution to Pakistan’s air defense needs.


Possible UCAV solutions for Future Air Combat


Establishing a requirement first requires the establishment of a doctrine. This is a critical weakness for the European Union were divergent needs are hard to align and researchers often have to work on the basis of practicality (Freitas, et al., 2009). As concerns PAF, there is a clear threat scenario and easier possibilities of establishing a doctrine. Based on an outlined doctrine, we can consider a number of possible UCAV solutions for the PAF in tackling the future threat scenario of an Indian PAKFA and other possible 5th generation aircraft.


Let us start with a quick recap of possible strategies. The general approach has been to counter India’s provocative procurements on a largely symmetric basis. Increasing number of manned fighter jets have been reciprocated by increases in Pakistan’s inventory of manned jets. Purchase of AEW assets have been matched by an equivalent purchase. Nuclear tests were responded to with equivalent nuclear tests as were ballistic missile tests. However, this asymmetry is increasingly impractical because of differing size and economic development between the two countries.


Meanwhile, India is now slated to acquire a large number of 5th generation planes in a 50-50 partnership with the Russians. Instead of attempting to break the bank and procure increasingly complex (and expensive) 5th generation fighters with the added exponential increase in maintenance and other operational costs, a solution may be to respond asymmetrically.


Two possible scenarios appear within a broad asymmetric strategy – positive asymmetry or negative asymmetry. Examples of implementing a negative asymmetric scenario against an IAF fielding significant numbers of 5th generation fighters would be to push back defenses further away from the border, rely more on LR-SAMs and resort to hardening major assets against the inevitable.


A strategy of positive asymmetry is also possible. This would imply responding asymmetrically but in a more proactive, aggressive and positive manner. This paper will outline such a strategy. As an example of such a strategy, Pakistan can choose to skip the 5th generation concepts and move towards combining the most practical of the 3rd, 4th and 5th generation with concepts deriving from the 6th generation; a simplified UCAV to supplement PAF’s 4+ generation fighters. This approach will not be unique. Japan for instance, may choose to skip the 5th Generation concept with its i3 fighter concept (Perrett, 2010).



A Practical UCAV for Pakistan


The attempt forward will be to propose a solution in the form of a UCAV for the PAF. We will first focus on some basic parameters that need to be fulfilled. The focus will then shift to defining a specific solution that meets those requirements in a most balanced manner.


We identify the following characteristics as imperative for the discussed UCAV solution:


1. Unmanned Platform

2. Simple construction and achievable technology
3. Simplified single-engine buildable in Pakistan
4. Relatively Low Cost
5. Economy and asymmetry in sensor load
6. Using parts bin of existing aircraft and from industry partners
7. Designed for high altitude, high speed f-pole BVR combat
8. Structure can operate in and sustain high G-forces
9. Artificial Intelligence
10. Network centric
11. Swarm & Group Tactics
12. Low Observable
13. Combat Air Patrol efficiency
14. Interceptor suitability


A specific solution to fulfill the above requirements is investigated next. For purposes of this paper, the designation used will be J-UCAV or Joint UCAV, assuming a partnership at least with China, if not with other countries such as Turkey, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, South Africa, Brazil, Argentina, Iran, Italy, and more. The proposed solution is in the form of a well-swept delta, single-engine UCAV.

The X-47 Pegasus is a design that broadly appears suitable for Pakistan’s requirements. The design features a simple, single engine, well-swept, diamond-shaped delta. The large delta provides low wing-loading, ideal for high altitude flight and maneuverability. The high sweep mitigates the delta’s drag, allowing a classic high-high aerodynamic profile to counter the PAKFA. Inherent structural integrity of the diamond-shape delta simplifies construction and allows the design to be strengthened for high G-forces  at a smaller weight and cost penalty.


While a tailless design appears most efficient in terms of drag and RCS, developing a maneuverable fighter may prove problematic and high-risk from the perspective of keeping the project within the meager budget and time constraint of the PAF. A proportionately small twin tail is proposed instead (not illustrated). This twin tail may or may not be supplemented by thrust vectoring. Developmentally, this suggests a safer choice and allows greater control authority. 

A single engine solution is proposed for the J-UCAV to be cost effective in acquisition and maintenance. As discussed earlier, since UCAVs do not need to fly frequently because of pilot training requirements and has to maintain a simple, cost effective solution. Simplicity of design and manufacture is important since the J-UCAV must be built in, and afforded by Pakistan.

The J-UCAV design proposed in this paper makes the hypothetical assumption of using an RD-93 or a WS-13 / WS-12 size engine. Taking a standard fighter aircraft engine as the benchmark can help allow the program to use the engine parts bin of an existing system. Assuming the stringent requirements for metallurgy, advanced composites and other advanced materials and manufacture processes can be relaxed, degraded or substituted to an extent, the UCAV engine can then perform adequately in the same thrust range with the tradeoff of degraded MTBF and reliability in lieu of low cost and simplicity.


A problem faced by a high-sweep delta design is poor CAP performance. This problem exists because of higher cruise speed as a result of sweep and greater drag because of delta wings. The solution proposed thus compromises our CAP requirements. To alleviate this issue and allow the J-UCAV better CAP performance, one possible solution is using non-movable, disposable canards. The reasoning behind such a solution is explainable as a fighter does not need to pull high Gs while on CAP, nor does it need to fly particularly fast. In fact, the slower and higher it can fly the better. Such flight profiles allow a balanced tradeoff between fuel efficiency and endurance, on the one hand, and potential kinetic energy from the high altitude profile. Adding high aspect ratio disposable canards can help slow and high flight profiles. In case of a threat, the fighter can dispose its canards in-flight and engage.


The diagram indicates possible locations for such canards. The canards may be added to the wing tips and / or forward of the wings. In the latter case, one anticipated issue is of clearance during disposal; avoiding the disposed canards from hitting the airframe. Some possible solutions are listed below:
1. Having an ejector mechanism that pushes the canards away from the airframe.
2. Building the forward disposable canards with light composite material and coating them with softer material to avoid damage in case of accidental collision.
3. Carefully planning disposal flight profile. For instance, a high angle-of-attack release profile, particularly possible with thrust vectoring, may allow seamless separation.

DSI intakes may also be incorporated to decrease RCS, increase performance, and reduce weight and costs. A possible improvement to DSI intake design that PAF, PAC Kamra and Chengdu engineers can look into may be a variable DSI. At first glance, this sounds contradictory given that DSI intakes are meant to supplant variable intake designs. However, a DSI bump that can enlarge or contract using pneumatic, hydraulic or other mechanisms can improve flight performance in a wide variety of flight profiles. These can possibly be significantly cheaper and lighter than more traditional variable inlet designs and simultaneously be stealthier. However, given Pakistan’s budget constraints, any J-UCAV program should not be stalled because of risky technology choices and men better qualified than this author can perhaps decide better whether to pursue such technologies.


Using off-the-shelf parts from existing platforms can reduce such development risks further and reduce costs and time. The F-117 program is testament to the usefulness of this strategy. The approach can be extended to the maximum possible parts from the JF-17 and Chinese combat aircraft, UAVs and UCAVs. A UCAV designed around an RD-93-class engine can possibly use a large number of subsystems from the JF-17; the landing gear is a possible example.



Other technology choices for the J-UCAV may include a 360 degree sensor suite similar to the F-35 and asymmetric sensor payloads. The latter implies that only a portion of the UCAVs / manned aircraft in a pack will have expensive systems such as AESA radars installed. Others will be more dispensable missile careers. This strategy is sometimes referred to as cloud shooting (Perrett, 2010) and is similar in concept to naval engagements. The Japanese concept is illustrated and shows relevance to our strategy with the exception that instead of 6th generation manned fighters guiding UCAV swarms, 4th generation fighters available to PAF may provide the equivalent UCAV guidance authority.

Given the ability today of remotely launching AAMs and the highly sensor rich environment over Pakistani air space in the time-frame of deployment, such auxiliaries would provide cheap force multipliers for Pakistan. There is some discussion among observers that at least some of PAF’s Mirage and F-7 fleets have been upgraded in a similar manner to launch BVR missiles using input from external sensors through the C4I network. While there is doubt about the feasibility and usefulness of maintaining older jets in this role with due consideration to pilot training and maintenance costs, J-UCAVs would provide ideal substitutes and appear to be perfect platforms for this role.

In the Grande Strategic view, PAF can use large numbers of J-UCAVs as a cheap and ideal counter for IAF and any other air force that seeks to undermine Pakistani airspace. They could form a picket line that are the first to deal with enemies and are reinforced with manned fighters where necessary. Such J-UCAVs would require very low maintenance, near zero training costs and may be cheap enough to not worry about being put outside hardened shelters, a valued commodity for PAF. Armed with 2 BVRs and 2 WVRs, J-UCAVs could prove to become the foot soldier of the skies, lightly armed and yet overwhelming in their numbers.
In Conclusion

UCAVs are an emerging technology that has the potential to revolutionize air warfare. While the 5th generation of combat planes is today the pinnacle of military aviation, UCAVs present paradigms that can supplement if not supplant manned fighters of the 4th and 5th generations. People who discuss a potential 6th generation inevitably mention unmanned aircraft as a likely salient. Unlike the 5th generation of aircraft that are extremely expensive and complex to build and maintain UCAVs provide the potential of finding an equivalent solution with significant reduction in complexity and cost.

The PAF has until now not considered UCAVs in the air-to-air role. With the systematic addition of net-centric warfare with platforms such as Erieye, ZDK03, ground radars, future planned communication satellite and the necessary middleware for a superior C4I, Pakistan has managed to transform the battle environment to one were UCAVS can multiply the effectiveness and flexibility of the entire air defense system.

While nations struggle to keep their 4th generation aircraft operational and can barely dream about 5th generation solutions, UCAVs provide an interesting paradigm shift that cannot be ignored by those entrusted with the defense of their nations and peoples. For some like Pakistan, UCAVs may be the only realistic way to counter a large number of PAKFAs and possibly other 5th generation planes sitting across the border in belligerent India, whose stalwarts dream about “cold starts” and “surgical strikes”, and are only kept at bay by the strength of arms and the courage of the Pakistani soldier; whether on land, in the depths of the seas, or up high over the towering mountains and skies above.

 

Posted in , | Leave a comment

Countering IAFs 5th Generation Fighter Aircraft



In the next decade all Air Forces are focusing on the Stealth Technology available in the 5th Gen aircraft. The IAF burnt by colossal failures with reference to indigenous aircraft and engine manufacturing was left with a huge gap. It has tried to fill the void which was left by the inability of the IAF to produce the LCA. That void is being filled by three level of purchases, the MCRC, the purchase of Russian PAKFA (called FGFA in Bharat) and possible direct purchase of aircraft from the US.

 
Within the next quarter century, the IAF is projected to have many 5th generation fighter aircraft. The Chinese Ari Force is Light Years ahead and faces no threat from Delhi. The PAF has taken note of the IAF numbers and is taking appropriate measures to deal with the situation.
The IAF in 2025 will have the PAKFA in service, provided the Russians can produce the aircraft and provided that they are not another generation of Flying Coffins.




The PAF Countermeasures are as follows:
  1. Begin the slow progress of mastering the technology so that it can be inculcated into existing Aircraft.
  2. Jointly design and build Aircraft with China with approach 5th generation and beyond.
  3. Purchase US aircraft with a bit older technology, and then upgrade those aircraft at lesser cost.
  4. Work with Indonesia, and Turkey in developing local military technologies to counter the threats.
  5. Use less expensive ways to deal with the incoming threat.
  6. Bank on Missiles to counter the threat.
  7. Bring incremental improvement to the JF-17 Thunder in Blcoks of fifty. This will keep the JF-17 thunder infused the latest technology for the next fifty years.
  8. Start production of the FC-20s based on the J-10B and work with the Chinese on the production of the J-11s.
  9. Enhance the UAV technology to the next level and design and produce Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles (UCAVs),
  10. One expensive option is to build X-47 Pegasus class, to counter India’s military aviation threat to Pakistan.
  11. Work with the Chinese to jontly build the WS-13 engine so that it can be used on the UCAV’s.
  12. Continue development of the Babur Cruise missile and use to to build UCAV’s.
  13. This mixture of response will not only be a potent defense against the IAF, but it will be eliminate the attempt of the IAF to intimidate Pakistan.
The first UCAV’s were autonomous cruise missiles, something that the U.S. and Germany have been fielding since the 1940′s. In Europe, several UCAV’s are known as robotic warplanes ( the Neuron, the Barrakuda and the Corax) are under development. These UACV concepts had their origins in the US,  and Europe wants to remain competitive with the American Aviation industry. All the programs have stealth features playing in the same league as the American J-UCAS (Joint Unmanned Combat Aerial System). The US  program includes the Boeing X45C and the Northrop Grumman X47B Pegasus . These European projects are the first foreign competitors for the American UCAV.
These major UCAV’ systems are in play:
  1. The six nation $480 million European effort has a produced a flying prototype.
  2. The joint German-Spanish, Swiss, Barrakuda conducted its first taxi tests on the 26 January 2006.
  3. The British Corax UACV. The UK perceives the Joint Strike Fighter as the last manned platform for its Air Force, which will eventually replaced by an UCAV. The Corax, which undertook its maiden flight already in 2004.
  4. China is making UCAV by adopting the old F-7 designs. China is using the J-6 and J-7 into target drones. Pakistan which already has the old F-7s can to this cheaply.
The UACVs have the following advantage:


  • Greater maneuverability – in modern day fighter aircraft human tolerance is the limiting factor for the number of g forces the plane can pool during rapid manoeuvres, with UACV this bottleneck is eliminated so they can be very manoeuvrable indeed.
  • Less weight – this can affect many things like endurance time, acceleration, payload and so on. One or two pilots and all the stuff you put in the cockpit can weight quite a bit.
  • Better aerodynamics – you don’t need the cockpit canopy.
    Situational awareness – as Clerik said you can create very good virtual cockpit on ground that is superior to anything you can fit in an aircraft. SA is most important for air superiority missions, I think, and as air-to-air battles are pushed to BWR there is no benefit of having your Mark I eyeball on the actual aircraft.
    No crew fatigue – on the ground pilots can control their UACVs in greater comfort and rotate during mission.
  • Lower price – often the flying unit can be made cheaper. All that fancy plane-human interface gear, life support, ejection seats and whatnot costs big $, but in case of UACV you only need the plane-human interface part and with that it is one for many planes and can bee cheaper as it doesn’t have to endure all the stresses and such. You need gear for communicating with UACVs instead, but some means of communication are already in place, so no big change there.
  • Pilots are out of harms way – UACVs will save pilots lives. Pilot is very expensive to train and hard to replace quickly.
  • Long Range Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Combat
  • Short Range within Visual Range Combat:
  • Low Costs:
  • Quantity versus Quality:
  • Kamikaze possibilities
The Disadvantages of UCAVs
  • Tackling the Problem of Jamming:
  • Human Element
  • Lag – radio communications can travel only so quickly but reaction time is critical for air engagements.
    Single point of failure – if the enemy takes out the command centre, all the UCAV’ are neutralized too.
Those who espouse following the C-47 route for the PAF are living in a fools paradise. The US will not share that technology with Pakistan and it will be too expensive for the PAF. The best route for the PAF will be to work with the Chinese and the Europeans to develop these unmanned systems.



Courtesy: Rupee News

Posted in , | 1 Comment

Fire-X, A Vertical Unmanned Air System (VUAS)


Fire-X, a vertical unmanned air system (VUAS) developed by Northrop Grumman and Bell Helicoptercompleted its first fully autonomous flight Dec. 10 at Yuma Proving Ground, Ariz., less than one year after development began.

"The speed which Fire-X was developed shows that a low-risk, fast-track solution can be safely flown using the proven MQ-8B Fire Scout's unmanned systems autonomous flight architecture," said Paul Meyer, sector vice president and general manager of the Advanced Programs and Technology Division at Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems.

"We developed a VUAS that meets growing needs for cargo and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities. We can now expand Fire-X's operational capabilities to meet emerging U.S. military requirements in all the Services and Special Operations Command."

First flight involved a short-duration hover to validate safe and reliable autonomous flight. Additional flight tests and reliability data gathering will be conducted in the coming weeks. Integration of ISR sensor payloads and cargo carrying capability test flights is set to occur early next year.

"The expertise of Northrop Grumman in unmanned systems combined with Bell's rotorcraft knowledge is what makes Fire-X so successful," said George Spongberg, Northrop Grumman Fire-X program manager.

"We've been able to share key insights throughout development - allowing a seamless transition of autonomous flight systems software to a new airframe."

First flight was accomplished in 11 months after development began. It was achieved by integrating Fire Scout's proven autonomous systems developed for the U.S. Navy with the highly successful Bell 407 helicopter, a FAA-certified helicopter that's been in commercial service worldwide since 1996.

The 407 system can carry ISR sensors and a useful load of more than 3,200 pounds - for fuel, payloads and/or enhanced cargo hauling capabilities - internally or externally. Fire-X will also be able to conduct ISR missions up to 16 hours in endurance and various cargo missions in support of U.S. Army and Marine Corps requirements.

The Fire-X demonstration aircraft will retain the ability to be optionally piloted - a capability which may appeal to military users because of its added operational flexibility.

READ MORE 

Posted in , | Leave a comment

China Shows Armed UAV Designs In Zhuhai Air Show

Pterodactyl_UAV
Between 40 and 50 unmanned air vehicle models were on display atAirshow China in Zhuhai in mid-November, including fixed- androtary-wing designs. While most of the systems appear to be aimed atintelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance applications, severalwere depicted carrying missiles.

Among the more notable armed mock-ups were thoseon view at the stands of AVIC and the China Aerospace and ScienceCorporation (COSIC). However, with officials from both organisationsunavailable to comment on the projects, their stage of development - ordeployment - is uncertain.

AVIC's Pterodactyl appears to be all butidentical to the General Atomics Predator A, complete with a V tail, alarge nose with an under-slung sensor dome and two missiles similar toLockheed Martin's AGM-114 Hellfire. AVIC says the design has "medium tolong endurance," but fails to provide specifics.



CH-3_UAV

Perhaps the most visually striking armed UAV on show was COSIC'sCH-3, which has its wings mounted toward the rear of its fuselage andlarge forward canards with control surfaces.

Data displayed by the company claims a maximum take-off weight of 640kg(1,410lb), a top speed of 220kt (407km/h) and an endurance of 12h, witha communications radius of 108nm (200km). The CH-3 can also carry twoprecision-guided air-to-surface weapons.


COSIC also exhibited a larger design with what appeared to beanti-ship missiles, with the system potentially similar to the NorthropGrumman RQ-4 Global Hawk.

WJ-600_UAV






A diagram showed the WJ-600 scanning a large area of ocean andproviding a data nexus for weapons platforms including aircraft, ships,submarines and shore-based missile batteries. The UAV was also depicteddestroying a helicopter and a ground target with its missiles.


 
ASN Technology displayed a model of its ASN-229A armed UAV, withthis also carrying two Hellfire-type weapons. The design has a bulbousnose, under-fuselage sensor dome and a twin-tail configuration.

ASN-229A_UAV




The display model featured a skid landing gear, but the type could alsobe launched with a rocket booster and recovered by parachute. ASN saysthe design has a maximum take-off weight of 800kg including a 100kgmission payload, and a mission endurance of 20h.

The company, which claims to produce 90% of China's UAVs, says the model is close to entering service.







"The ASN-229A is still in its testing phase, but we expect it to beready by the end of next year," says an industry source, who adds:"China is investing significant resources in its UAV programmes."


CH-802_UAV
Further evidence of the nation's interest inunmanned systems was widespread, with several designs bearing a closeresemblance to Western and Israeli designs.

These included COSIC's 6.5kg hand-launched CH-802, reminiscent ofAeroVironment's legacy Pointer, and AVIC's Night Eagle, which sharescommon design features with the Australian-developed Aerosonde series.


V750_UAV
In the rotorcraft sector, an unmanned development named the V750 wason show. With a rotor diameter of 7.24m (23.7ft), this has a 750kgmaximum take-off weight including an 80kg mission payload and areported service ceiling of 9,840ft.

 Also on display was a V-tailed non-military design dubbed the SL-200.


SL-200_UAV



This was shown with three smoke pipes installed under each wing, withthese intended to generate artificial precipitation. Exhibit materialsays the 180kg design could be flown to an altitude of 19,700ft.














Posted in , | Leave a comment

Aurora Flight Sciences Unveiled its Orion Unmanned Air System



Aurora Flight Sciences unveiled its Orion unmanned air system, ademonstrator that will stay aloft for up to five days, on 22 Novemberin Mississippi.

Orion was selected by the US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) inlate August to meet the objectives of the Medium Altitude Global ISRand Communications (Magic) Joint Capability Technology Demonstration(JCTD).

The programme's goal is to demonstrate a five-day flight of the Orionat 20,000ft (6,100m) with a 453kg (1,000lb) intelligence, surveillanceand reconnaissance payload.
First flight is expected in mid-2011, the company says. Orion wasdeveloped under the sponsorship of both the AFRL and the US Army Spaceand Missile Defense Command and with Aurora private funding.

Aurora claimed victory over Lockheed Martin on Magic with Orion inSeptember. The Virginia-based company is doing most of the work on theproject from its Columbus, Mississippi, facility under the $4.7 millioncontract win.

Before the contract announcement, the company had hoped to make a firstflight with the UAV in late October 2010. However, the schedule wasslowed to enable the parties to evaluate payload options, concepts ofoperations and then grow and refine the requirements, Aurora says.

The AFRL's requirements for Magic's medium-altitude, extremepersistence aircraft are for it to remain airborne for up to 155h whilecarrying a 226kg payload at 15,000ft. The same aircraft also would beexpected to carry a 1,130kg payload for up to 80h at the same altitude,it says.

Aurora says Orion is relatively low-risk for a demonstration project.Rather than the liquid hydrogen fuel route other experimentalhigh-altitude, ultra-long endurance aircraft are following, its designis powered by the same Austro diesel engines used on Aurora's Centauroptionally piloted vehicle, based on the Diamond DA42.


Posted in | Leave a comment

Chinese Air Force New UAV Design

During the Airshow China here at Zhuhai, Avic Defense and one of thecountry's aeronautics academic institutions, launched a competitionwith the Chinese air force for new UAV designs. The prize is to beawarded next year and to spur some innovative thinking.

On one of the Chinese CD handouts were a couple of concept drawings.Where they are from or what they represent is unclear, but they arenonetheless entertaining.

And with China already working on its J-10 follow-on, here's somefodder for speculation (the airframe, below, actually looks very littlelike what China's 5th Gen Fighter is believed to look like, let's justcall it the 6th Gen concept.

Posted in , | Leave a comment

China Unveiled Its Latest Predator-Reaper Like UAV--Zhuhai Air Show


These Chinese Uavs are equipped With AR-1 laser guided missiles and these are chinese attack Uavs.

Posted in , | Leave a comment

Russia could make Aerial Drones without Israeli help claims company


Russia does not need Israeli assistance to make progress in thedevelopment of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), including militarydrones, the head of a Russian UAV production company said on Thursday.

A senior Israeli defense source quoted in Flight International saidearlier that Israel may tear up much of the unprecedented militarycooperation deal it signed with Russia at the start of this month dueto anger over Moscow's decision to supply Yakhont naval missiles toSyria.


"In the next two or three years, there will be a breakthrough in theRussian UAV market regardless of the Israeli position on this issue,"Vladimir Verba, the director general of the Vega company.

Verba said his company had developed a comprehensive UAV developmentprogram until 2025, which had been approved by the majority of itscustomers, including the Federal Security Service (FSB) and theInterior Ministry.

He also said Vega had been developing strike and reconnaissancedrones for the Russian military in cooperation with Russia's UnitedAircraft Corporation (UAC).
The Russian military stressed the need to provide the Armed Forceswith advanced reconnaissance systems in the wake of a brief militaryconflict with Georgia in August 2008, when the effectiveness of Russianmilitary operations was severely hampered by the lack of reliableintelligence.

According to various estimates, the Russian military needs up to 100UAVs and at least 10 guidance and control systems to ensure effectivebattlefield reconnaissance.
The Russian Defense Ministry has previously expresseddissatisfaction with locally manufactured UAVs, and decided to buy themfrom Israel.

According to the ministry, some 50 Russian military servicemen areundergoing training in the use of Israeli-built UAVs and that a totalof twelve have been bought.
Russia has reportedly signed two UAV contracts with Israel. Underthe first contract, signed in April 2009, Israel delivered two Bird Eye400 systems (worth $4 million), eight I View MK150 tactical UAVs ($37million) and two Searcher Mk II multi-mission UAVs ($12 million).

The second contract was for the purchase of 36 UAVs, worth a total of $100 million, to be delivered later this year.

Russia and Israel have also been negotiating the establishment of a joint $300-million venture to produce UAVs.

Posted in , | Leave a comment

Israel to Cancel UAV deal with Russia over Syria arms sale


Israel may tear up much of theunprecedented military cooperation deal it signed with Moscow at thestart of this month due to anger over Moscow's rigid stance onsupplying naval missiles to Israel's enemy Syria.

"We will have to reconsider allproposed deals with Russia. Moscow did not show the necessaryunderstanding of our requests," a senior Israeli defense source quotedon aviation business magazine Flight International's website said onThursday.

Earlier this week, Moscow confirmed itwould supply P-800 Yakhont supersonic naval cruise missiles to Syria,despite vociferous Israeli objections to the deal which was signed in2007.

The first victim of the fallout couldbe Russia and Israel's planned $300 million deal to set up an unmannedair vehicle (UAV) manufacturing facility in Russia.
Russia has spent around $50 million onIsraeli-built UAVs this year to train operators and develop tactics forusing modern systems.

It has also expressed interest in buying more Israeli UAV systems, including the IAI Heron.

The Russian forces have previously expressed dissatisfaction with locally manufactured UAVs.

Posted in , , | Leave a comment

Strike Weapon of Today UAVs: Special-Report


It has been one of the most dramatic and universal changes in military“tactics, techniques and procedures” in history. From a single,barebones “eye in the sky” over Iraq in1992 to “persistentintelligence, surveillance,and reconnaissance” (ISR) a decade laterto“persistent strike” tomorrow, the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) hasbecome an absolute necessity to war fighters of all nations, allservices, all ranks.
The American military and other world Armed services are now seems tobe acquiring a effective fleet of battlefield UAVs. The world armedservices are entering a new era in which UAVs will be critical tocombat operations, with the machines carrying imaging reconnaissance orSIGINT payloads, relaying the data over high-bandwidth data links inreal time to ground, air, sea, and space platforms. This trend had beenemerging before the American war in Afghanistan in 2001-2002, but wasgreatly accelerated by the use of UAVs in that conflict.


UAVs were the fastest-growing segment of the aerospace sector in 2008,with a worldwide value of more than $3.4 billion (USD). More than 42countries have gone on record as producing at least one UAV airframe,and nearly 1,000 systems exist today, worldwide. 262 Producers of UAVs- 42 Countries. Europe 18, UAVS Research and Development BY 49countries Europe 21, Future UAVs producing countries in 2010 9, Europe5.

Unmanned systems murdering civilians is counter-productive to winninghearts & minds and actually makes more rebels. It is noted that themilitary UAV market was worth US$250million in 1992, rapidly increasingto US$600million in 1997, but projected to level off at US700million in2002. However, it is noted that the civilian UAV market is projected toincrease from the insignificant level in 1997 to an incredibleUS$500million in 2002.

Predators originally were designed for reconnaissance and surveillance,but now some are armed with ¬laser-¬guided Hellfire missiles. A massivechange has thus occurred in the airspace above wars. Only a handful ofdrones were used in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, with just one supportingall of V Corps, the primary U.S. Army combat force. Today there aremore than 5,300 drones in the U.S. military’s total inventory. Themilitary has dozens of Predators in Iraq and Afghanistan. In all itoperates 5,000 drones, 25 times more than it had in 2001.

The US`s National Defense Authorization Fiscal Year 2001 legislationdeclared `It shall be a goal of the Armed Forces to achieve thefielding of unmanned, remotely controlled technology such that ... by2010, one-third of the aircraft in the operational deep strike forceaircraft fleet are unmanned. Establish a plan to develop a newland-based, long-range strike force by 2018, of which about 45 percentwould be unmanned; to expand maritime aviation to include unmannedaircraft for both surveillance and strike missions
`

Annually investing hundreds of millions of dollars in developing andadvancing UAV technology for its own use and export, the US program isprojected to be $10 billion from 2003 to 2010.

The Netherlands is not the only nation to employ Israeli unmannedaerial vehicles (UAVs) in foreign occupation. They are also utilized byCanadian, US, UK and Australian forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In fiscal year 2002, U.S. military drones (both killer and unarmed)flew 27,201 hours, according to a recent Congressional report. Byfiscal year 2007, that figure had increased ten-fold, to 258,502 hours.In the first eight months of fiscal year 2008, the drones had logged230,000 hours. . The longest declassified Predator flight was 40 hours,5 minutes

UAV usage across all the military services jumped from nearly 165,000flight hours in the 2006 fiscal year, to more than 258,000 for thefiscal year that ended Sept. 30, 2007. The total flight time hasreached 400 thousand hours as of march 2009

Pentagon's inventory of unmanned aerial systems has leapt from about200 in 2002 to nearly 6,000 in 2008, For the 2008 fiscal year, theDefense Department has a $15 billion budget just for unmanned systems

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) continue to be the most dynamic growthsector of the world aerospace industry, 2009 market study estimatesthat UAV spending will almost double over the next decade from currentworldwide UAV expenditures of $4.4 billion annually to $8.7 billionwithin a decade, totaling just over $62 billion in the next ten years.

The Army has five types of UAVs. In 2006, there were about 1,870 ArmyUAVs, and that number is expected to grow to about 4,200 by late 2008.Army UAVs are used mostly to spot enemy movements and roadside bombs
The Air Force flies two major UAV systems known as the Predator and theGlobal Hawk. Both operate at high altitudes and carry a wide range ofweapons to attack enemy armor, trucks and troops.

Recently released “The Market for UAV Reconnaissance Systems,” whichclaims that the total UAV market including air vehicles, ground controlequipment and payloads is expected to be worth $13.6 billion through2014. More than 9,000 UAVs are expected to be purchased over the next10 years by countries in every region of the world, and ForecastInternational does not include funding for RDT&E and operations andmaintenance in its analysis.

The study suggests that the US will account for 72% of the worldwideRDT&E spending on UAV technology over the next decade, and about61% of the procurement. "We expect that the sales of UAVs will followrecent patterns of high-tech arms procurement worldwide, with Europerepresenting the second largest market, followed very closely byAsia-Pacific.

To put funding in perspective, the DOD’s FY04 budget includes around $1billion for all UAV spending, but more than $5.5 billion for just threeshort-range manned fighter programs. On the other hand, this UAVfunding is up from only $360 million in FY01 and $760 million in FY02.
International UAV market analyses have estimated the total value of theglobal UAV Systems market to be worth in excess of US$19.5 billion overthe next six years (1998 to 2003).

“Nearly 8000 unmanned air-vehicles (UAVs) worth $3.9 billion wereproduced worldwide between 1994 and 2003. The reconnaissance market isexpected to double in size over the ten-year period, UAV annualforecast., estimates that 5250 target drones worth $1.3 billion and2650 reconnaissance systems worth $2.6 billion were procured during thedecade. The estimate does not consider the cost of related hardwaresuch as ground-control stations. It only covers air-vehicle costs,which constitute as little as 15% of many UAV systems.”

Many years of bombing have preceded this bombing year 36,000 bombingraids in 2008 and an estimated 144,000 resistance fighters killed intheir own countries - by invaders - in the first 11 months of 2008,37,034 bombing raid in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2008.

Today, no less than 45 countries fly hundreds of different UAV models;in the U.S. alone, there are approximately 280 companies, academicinstitutions, and government groups developing more than 200 differentUAV designs ranging in price from $1000 to $26 million dollars

japan, leads in commercial UAV use with approximately 2000 unmannedhelicopters spraying fields for pest abatement or seeding crops.

Worldwide, these UAVs range in size from the palm-size Black Widow“micro” UAV spy plane (6 inch. in diameter, 1.5 oz) to NorthropGrumman’s RQ-4/Global Hawk (weighing in at 25,600 lb).DOD issued theUnmanned Systems Roadmap 2007-2032 (Roadmap), UAS programs. In 2001,for example, the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology,and Logistics created the joint Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Planning TaskForce to serve as a joint advocate for developing and fielding UAS.

Establish a plan to develop a new land-based, long-range strike forceby 2018, of which about 45 percent would be unmanned; to expandmaritime aviation to include unmanned aircraft for both surveillanceand strike missions

DOD’s funding plans for UAS reflect their growing importance to thedepartment. In fiscal year 2009, DOD requested approximately $3.5billion for UAS procurement and research and development—approximately$1 billion more than the department’s fiscal year 2008 request, DODplans to make additional investments in UAS programs from fiscal years2010 through 2017.

From 2008-2017 USA is going to spend US$18,577 million for UAVsProcument .Europe is going to spend US$ 40.47 billion from 2008-20017

From July 2005 to June 2006, the 15th Reconnaissance Squadronparticipated in more than 242 separate raids, engaged 132 troops incontact-force protection actions, fired 59 Hellfire missiles; surveyed18,490 targets, escorted four convoys, and flew 2,073 sorties for morethan 33,833 flying hours

During Operation DESERT STORM, UAVs were successfully employed by theArmy, Navy, and Marine Corps to provide NRT day/night RSTA, BDA, andbattlefield management. UAVs TYPE year used 1991 Kuwait,Iraq(1)RQ-2Pioneer (2) FQM-151 Pointer , UAVs proved to be fair weather aircraft.During Operation DESERT STORM in 1991, rain eroded the laminated woodpropellers of Pioneer UAVs.11 During the 1990s, precipitation, fog, andcrosswinds often prevented safe takeoffs and landings. Lightweight UAVssuch as the Predator, the Hunter, and the Pioneer were less able tocope with high winds than heavier manned aircraft. a Pioneer flyingover northeastern Saudi Arabia detected the Iraqi attack on Khafji,enabling U.S. air strikes to decimate the invaders. Pioneers alsoserved as artillery spotters for a battleship in the Persian Gulf.

MARTs were used successfully for reconnaissance and target acquisition,and were the only entirely European-built UAVs used over Iraq duringthe 1991 Gulf War

UAVs Station in Bosnia in 93-96 by different countries. France-Crecerrelle, UN- Fox NET, USA- (1) Gnat750,(2)Pioneer,(3)Predator

Kosovo war 98-99.France (1) CL-289(2) Crecerrelle.Germany CL-289.Unitedkingdom Phoenix’s.USA (1) Pioneer(2) predator(3)Hunter. Kosovo -05Belgium Hunter .Djibouti/Yemen -02 ,predator.East Timor -02 AustraliaAeroSonde III.Solomon Islands-03 Australia (1)AeroSonde III (2) Avator.

Afghanistan UAVs Station by different countries 2001- 2009. Australia(1)Scan Eagle.Canada (1) Sperwer(2)Sky Lork.France (1)Skorpio(2)Sperwer(3) SIDM interim medium-altitude.Germany(1)Aladin(2)Luna.Netherland (1) Aladin(2) Skylork(3)Sperwer.UAE(1)S-100.United Kingdom (1) Desert hawk(2)Herti (3)Predator B.USA (1)Dragon eye(2)Global- hawk(3)pointer(4)Predator (5) shadow(6)Reaper(7)Sea scout.Poland Sky Lark. Orbiter mini UAVs

Iraq, UAVs station by different countries 2003-2009.Australia(1)Scan-Eagle(2)Sky-lork.Italy (1) Predator. Japan (1) RMAX.Romania (1)Shadow-600.UK(1)DesertHawk(2)Hermes-450,(3)phoenix.USA(1)Desert-Hawk(2)Scan-Eagle(3)Dragon-eye(4)Global- Hawk(5)IGnat(6)Hunter(7)Pioneer(8)predator(9)Reaper(10)Puma(11)Raven(12) Tern (13)Shadow-200(14)Silver-fox(15)Snow-Goose(16)Wasp.
UAVs Station in different countries by other countries.Angolo 2003-2009,IL Contract(1) Aerostar.South-Korea 2003 ,USA(1)Shadow 200.IVORY Coast04 IL Contract,Aerostar.Ivory Coast 2006 ,France (1)skorpio.DR Congo,Belgium(1) Hunter. Lebanon 2006,FRANCE (1) sperwer.Kosovo 2007France(1)sperwer.Chad-08,France(1)SkyLark.

UAVs provided a large percentage of the tactical reconnaissanceconducted in Kosovo. Most UAVs were operating at much lower altitudesthan manned aircraft—only a few thousand feet. Yet both the dollar andhuman costs of this 25:2 loss ratio were still far greater for themanned aircraft (even without including the cost of rescue operations).Tactical UAVs, with sensors, cost only about 1/100th as much as amanned platform

Drones" were lost by NATO USA during the war in Yugoslavia.UnitedStates: 17 (3 Predators, 9 Hunters, 4 Pioneers, 1 UAV of undeterminedtype) Germany: 7 (presumably all CL-289 turbojet drones) France: 5 (3Crecerelle, 2 CL-289) Britain: 14 (14 Phoenix) 4 UAVs of undeterminedorigin (possibly U.S., German, or Italian) (Sources French Le Mondenewspaper, http://uav.navair.navy.mil)
The total bill to U.S. taxpayers for lost drones in Afghanistan is over$55 million. The Global Hawk is manufactured by Northrup Grumman atRancho Bernardo, CA, at a cost of $15 million each, while the PredatorRQ-1 is made in San Diego, California, by General Atomics, with a unitprice tag of $ 4.5 million
Drones Lost in Afghan Theater, 2001-2002

In fact, about one-third of the 65 Predators which had been built byearly 2002 had crashed. A report in Defense Week in May 2002 noted thatof a fleet of 65 in total, 23 Predator drones [or 35 percent] had gonedown -- nine were shot down, eight experienced mechanical problemsand/or bad weather, and six losses were chalked up to human error
Global Hawk unit cast $ 15 million deployed 2 ,Crashed 2 , % destroyed100. Predator unit cast $ 4.5 million Deployed 12,,Crashed 2 , 100.Predator unit cast $ 4.5 million Deployed 12,crashed 6,destroyed 50%.

Iraq UAVs crash including 76 UAVs (mostly British+USA) alone in2003-2004. Iraq war started in March 2003, it had 14 unmanned aerialvehicles (UAVs); it now has about 700 in Iraq and Afghanistan, most ofthem small. In 2003 and 2004, the Army flew the aircraft about 1,500hours per month,. In2005, the aircraft flew 9,000 hours a month.'in2007 Predator flight hours are expected to exceed 70,000 hours, morethan triple the total in 2003, the war's first year. Of the 139Predators delivered to the Air Force, 53 have been lost till 2007
,
To meet the surge in demand, the Air Force is ramping up its trainingpipeline, growing its training capacity from 160 new crews per year to360 by 2010 with the opening of new training schools at Holloman AirForce Base, N.M., and March Air Reserve Base, Calif.
Hunter and Shadow training is 12 weeks and Sky Warrior training is 25weeks. As of October, the Army had trained 3,200 UAV enlisted.Crewmembers are trained at the Air Force Predator school, whichgraduated 105 crews in 2006. The Air Force expects 120 two-member crewswill graduate in 2007 and 148 in 2008. It takes about three months totrain a crew.

On the airborne side, four systems--the Raven, the Shadow, the Hunterand the Sky Warrior--have logged more than 300,000 hours duringOperation Iraqi Freedom. When that operation first started, "you couldmeasure the (use of) unmanned aircraft systems in maybe tens of hours aday,"By 2005, that number had climbed to about 100 hours per day, andnow that figure has reached about 500 hours per day.

185 UA losses were recorded, 1991-2003. An average of 14.2 per year.Considering the specific periods of major conflict; 20 RQ-2 Pioneer UAwere lost in Desert Storm over a period of less than a year, 18 werecombat losses and two were non-combat losses. In Operation Allied Forcein Kosovo, 47 UA of various types were lost. Of the 45 losses, 28 werecombat and 19 were non-combat.
47 drones lost by the US military and air force in the past six years, 67% went down due to operator error, so at £5m each .

12 key members of Unmanned Vehicle Systems (UVS) International drovethe formation of the Euro UAV ICB, namely: QinetiQ (UK), ADSE (TheNetherlands), Dassault Aviation (France), EADS Defence & SecuritySystems (DS) (France & Germany), Saab (Sweden), and Sagem (France)newly formed Euro UAV Industry Consultation Body (ICB). The companies -Vigilance BV, (The Netherlands), EADS Socata, (France), Thales Sensors,(UK), Thales Airborne Systems, (France), Thales Avionics, (France),Logstar Aviacion, (Spain), TRC AB, (Sweden), Blyenburgh & Co,(France) –

Austrian models(1) Schiebel Camcopter S-100, reconnaissance. Schiebelof Austria has developed a helicopter mini-UAV named the "CamCopter5.1", which was evaluated by such customers as the US Air Force as partof studies in developing improved defenses from terrorist attacks onmilitary installations. It has also been tested by the United StatesArmy for use in landmine detection, using both infrared and groundpenetrating radar sensors. The CamCopter 5.1 has been delivered to theUS military, France, and the Egyptian Navy. To date, no procurement isknown to have been made, UAVs for LawEnforcement and Border Protectionpurpose.

The German Ministry of Defense (MoD) recently selected the verticaltakeoff and landing (VTOL) CAMCOPTER S-100 UAV system from Schiebel(Vienna, Austria) for its Navy fleet. CAMCOPTER is fabricated withcarbon/epoxy prepregs from Advanced Composites Group Ltd. (ACG, RoverTJ125 turbojet with 510 N (52 kg / 114 lb) thrust. It was launched by aRATO booster and recovered by parachute

Belgian models (1) EPERVIER drone (1969) It was built by ManufactureBelge De Lampes Et De Materiel Electronique SA (MBLE) of Belgium.Epervier prototypes were propeller-driven, but the production EpervierUAV, the "X.5" model, was fitted with. Belgium(1) Flying Cam(2)B-HUNTER (UAV) (2002) has 18 but two crashed one DR CONGO in 2008and 2nd was in belgium. Belgium has also extended its use of UAVs forpollution detection and in assisting with forest fire detection, andlooking at how to integrate UAVs into Air Traffic Control systems.

Bulgarian models (1)RUM-1, target (1967) (2)RUM-2, target (1967)(3)RUM-2M, target (1969) (4)RUM-2MB, target (1971) (5)M-200, target(1971) (6)UtRUM, targer (1974) (7)P-200, target (1975) (8)Yastreb-1,target (1978) (9)Yastreb-2, target (1981) (11)Yastreb-3,target (1982)(12)NITI (2006)

Chinese (PRC) models The People’s Liberation Army Air Force is believedto be making steady progress in adopting and adapting more moderntechnologies in China’s domestic military UAV programs, includinginitial moves into the development of combat UAVs (UCAVs). Whiledetails are difficult to verify, the WuZhen-9 stealthy reconnaissanceUAV (also designated as WZ-9 and WZ- 2000) is, in outward appearance, avirtual clone of the U.S. Global Hawk, although considerablysmaller.China has different UAVs Manufacturing companies (1) BeijingWisewell Avionics Science and Technology Company has 2 UAVs model(2)CAIC has 2 UAVs model.(3) Xi'An ASN Technology Group has 4 UAVsmodel.(3) Xi'An ASN Technology Group has 4 UAVs MODEL

(1)ChangKong-1, target, reconnaissance (1966) (2)ChangKong-2 Animprovement of the Changkon-1 Maneuverable Drone, the ultra-lowaltitude variant, was developed by Nanjing Aeronautical Institute. Likethe former, the drone was designed for missile testing, in this casefor low-altitude air-to-ground missiles.approved in (1989)

(3)ASN-206 Its primary military applications reportedly are day andnight reconnaissance, battlefield surveillance, target location,artillery fire correction, and battle damage assessment. (4)WuZhen-5 InNovember 1972, the WZ 5 pilotless aircraft made its first successfuldeployment from a Tu-4 and was certified after a test flight in May1978. In the test, the WZ-5 had a flight time of 3 hours, 14 minutesand had a range of 2,380 km. The WZ-5 was certified for delivery to theChinese military in December 1980 (4)WZ-2000, reconnaissance (2003)(6)Xianglong Unmanned Reconnaissance Aerial Vehicle, militaryreconnaissance (2009(7) W-50 UAV(8)

Combined with Predator-sized UAVs that also may be designed for weaponsdelivery as well as S/R missions, China has demonstrated a growingpotential to bring U.S.-style unmanned combat assets to any futureconflict. The country also has become an exporter of UAVs to suchcountries as Bangladesh, Egypt, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Zambia,and Zimbabwe, through the efforts of the government owned ChinaNational Aero Technology Import and Export Corporation.

France continues to dominate the UAV landscape in Europe, with some 50different platforms or variants in domestic production and a role indozens of programs for other nations. One of the earliest was the Altec"Mini-Avion de Reconnaissance Telepilote (MART)" series, with the MARTII serving with French forces in the Gulf War.France top UAVsManufacturing companies (1) DSTU (Dassault Aviation) has 5 UAVs model(2) EADS DS has 9 UAVs MODEL (3) ECT Industries has one UAVs MODEL(4)Onéra has one UAVs MODEL (5) Survey-Copter has one UAVs MODEL (6) Sagemhas 9 UAVs model(7) Alcore Technologies has 4 UAVs model (8) PY Designhas one UAVs model.(9) Tecknisolar-Seni has 4 UAVs model.

French models The French Sagem firm developed a medium-sized UAV,derived from the popular Meggitt Banshee target, known as the"Crecerelle" ("Kestrel" or "Sparrowhawk") SAGEM is now selling animproved derivative of the Crecerelle named the "Sperwer", and it isbeing operated by the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, France, and Greece.The Swedes call it the "Ugglan (Owl)".Canada also buy Sperwer (1)SAGEMSperwer, reconnaissance

(2)Dassault AVE-D Petit Duc, research (2000) It was flown for the firsttime eight years ago (July 2000), designed to test and validationadvanced Uninhabited Air Vehicles (UAV), stealth designs and autonomousflight. As part of this stealth design evaluation, a tail-less versionof the aircraft designated AVE-C was flown in June 2003. According toDassault, the flight marks a significant first for the company,confirming its expertise in Uninhabited Air Vehicles. AVE-D autonomousflight demonstration for DGA: June 30, 2008

(3)Dassault AVE-C Moyen Duc, research (2001) The two first vehicles,AVE-D and AVE-C, are scale model 1/100 (50kg) and 1/10 (500kg) stealth"tactical drones" (UAV), while the final version was to be a full scale(5,000kg) prototype stealth "combat drone" (UCAV). Each vehicle wasgiven an owl name as "Duc" ("duke") is the French name of a nocturnalbird of prey specie known in Latin as Otus aka Scops owl. Petit Duc("small duke") stands for Scops Owl, Moyen Duc ("medium duke") standsfor Long-eared Owl and Grand Duc ("large duke") is Eagle Owl. OtherDassault aircraft with bird names are the Dassault MD 315 Flamant(Flamingo) and the Dassault Falcon (Falcon) family.

(4)Dassault-Sagem SlowFast, reconnaissance (2004) The Dassault-SagemSlowFast is a tactical stealth UAV concept designed by the Frenchunmanned aircraft manufacturer Dassault-Sagem Tatical UAV in 2004.TheSlowFast is an evolution of the twin-engine tactical UAV Dassault AVE-CMoyen Duc. The SlowFast designation comes from its versatility toperform high-speed reconnaissance flight (Mach 1.6) and 3-4 hoursautonomy low-speed (120 kt) observation mission. Its ground station isbased on the Sagem Sperwer's model. The drone was designed after theFrench Army's needs and is planned to be used by the Ground Forcedivisions

(5)Verhagen X2 Autonomous Helicopters, flycam reconnaissance (2008(6)Flying-Robots FR102, softs wings based (2008) Paris-based FlyingRobots also sells inflatable-wing UAS. The company began in 2004 andits aircraft are now on the markethe company's FR102 can carry up to250 kilograms (551 pounds) for 12 to 24 hours, a performance levelsimilar to the SnowGoose. The company has sold one system to France'sspecial forces, which are evaluating it, and another to China. theFR102 is particularly suited to pipeline inspection and the company istalking with several large petroleum firms about that use.

(7)MART-ll MARTs were used successfully for reconnaissance and targetacquisition, and were the only entirely European-built UAVs used overIraq during the 1991 Gulf War. Altec Industries purchased all rights tothe MART air vehicle in August 1991, and became the prime contractorfor the MART Mk II system. The Mk II was based on in-the-field lessonsfrom the Gulf War (8) ALTEC (9) Matra BAE Dynamics developed a UAVnamed "Dragon", no relation to the BAI Dragon.

(9) The Tracker system allowing the user to see behind a hill, theTracker very short-range UAV system is dedicated to intelligencegathering for the infantry. Simple and rustic, the unit is carried in abackpack and can be operated by just two soldiers. Its design allows itto reach a speed of 100 km and a maximum altitude of 2 km. The TrackerUAV can be used for detection, reconnaissance, identification,classification and tracking.(10) Scorpio Scorpio UAVs is simple,low-cost systems, well adapted to urban zones and partitioned areas. Itis equipped with a gyro-stabilised turret and can carry out missions inall weather conditions. The payload includes EO/IR, TV andcommunication relays. the Scorpio, which weighs less than 15 kg,

(11) Surveyor-600. The Surveyor-600 will be able to rapidly adjust itsspeed according to the needs of the mission. It will accommodate a 65-kg payload, including EO/IR, TV, ESM/ECM sensors and radars as well asa laser designator. The system will integrate the latest datainterpretation and fusion technologies. The device will carry outsurveillance of strategic points as well as identification andclassification of targets. It will have the capability of targeting andeven launching smart sub-ammunitions.(12) Surveyor-2500
This 5.50 metre-long and 1.50 metre-high UAV will be able to carry outall kinds of missions, from surveillance to reconnaissance, control,and even communication relay. Its 12-hour endurance gives it a range of200 km, and the device has a data link capability of up to 185 km. Itwill also be a great asset for civilian missions, such as formeteorology or cartography purposes.

(13) CL-289 The latest version of the well-known CL-289 has just beendeveloped. A fast reconnaissance drone, the CL-289 has been in servicewithin the French and German forces since 1992. In January 2001, EADSDornier was awarded a contract for the modernisation of 160 CL-289s inboth countries. The new CL-289 can land with precision of 50 metres.These upgraded units was delivered in 2006.

(14)ORKA 1200, This multi-mission helicopter system is dedicated toreconnaissance and the protection of maritime and air-landenvironments. The ORKA system includes a payload EO/IR as well as amaritime surveillance radar and a secured high speed data link. Withsuch advanced equipment, ORKA offers navies both naval supremacy andland attack operations capabilities. Its high payload capability (180kg) and autonomy (8 hours) make it possible to carry out imagery orelectromagnetic intelligence missions in a selected area.

(15) EuroHawk EADS DSS and Northrop Grumman are teaming up on the HALE(High Altitude Long Endurance) EuroHawk programme. In October 2003, theGlobal Hawk was successfully tested in-flight from the base ofNordholz, equipped with an EADS ELINT sensor. This reconnaissance andsurveillance system is dedicated to high-altitude and longenduranceflights. The German Ministry of Defence expressed its desire to replacethe Breguet Atlantic in service within the German navy with these UAVHALEs

(16) Eagle -1,and Eagle -2 UAV system has been developed by EADS, inorder to meet European requirements for strategic reconnaissance andsurveillance, in support of out-of area operations. Two versions wereplanned – Eagle 1, powered by a 115 hp Rotax 914 engine which can flyat 25,000' and the Eagle 2 turboprop powered version (1200 hp PT6Aengine), designed for 24 hours operation at 45,000'. Fully integratedinto modern NATO C4I infrastructures, EAGLE become a major assetnetwork centric operations of the French army. It is also be fieldedwith other NATO members. The aircraft can be deployed from airstripswith runways as short as 600 meters (eagle 1) and 1,000 m' (Eagle 2).

(17) DER or Bourdon Tecknisolar Seniof France has been devel- opingsolar power UAVs, the creation of a 3.5kg electric drone fitted with acolour camera which sends real time video images to a ground basedscreen. The screen is integrated into either a back pack, case or imagereceiving hehnet, all of which are solar pow- ered and totallyautonomous. It is intended for use by Mili- tary Commando Units, TaskForces and Military Scouts etc (18) Libellule Libellule, a highaltitude drone, is able to reach alti-tudes of 25 to 30km. Propelled bysolar energy, this stealth drone is able to manoeuvre around apre-defined area for several weeks without the need for any humanintervention

(19) Buteo Called Buteo, this electric apparatus is neither an aero-plane nor a helicopter but both. It is conceived as a prototype of ahybrid of an aeroplane and a helicopter. It is capable of hovering likea helicopter but also has the added dynamic flight manoeuvres of anaeroplane. It has been designed for mine detection, charge placement,identification of radioac- tive sources around nuclear power stationsand for aerial pho- tography through the windows of high rise buildings

(20) Portable Video Re-transmission Coccinelle Weighing between 280 and400grams, named Coccinelle or Ladybird, this drone is intended forforces of law and order, police, fire fighters etc. Particularly quiet,this drone is equipped with a colour camera and transmits real timevideo images to a ground based back pack or case with integratedscreen. Both the back pack and case are solar pow- ered and thereforecompletely autonomous. it cannot be detected by mag- netic waves, or byinfrared waves as it does not heat up, often friction in the air at acertain speed creates heat, or by laser beams because it neitherreflects nor reverberates. Totally si- lent and non-polluting the droneis 1.8m long, has a wing span of 4.2m and weighs 2.5kg. This is adevelopment of the Libelulle high altitude drone.


The launch of the joint development of two demonstrators oflatest-generation UAVs. The first one is the reconnaissance UAVEuroMALE, in which EADS is the prime contractor (in partnership withThales, which will jointly ensure with EADS the development of groundsegment). Dassault Aviation will look after the development of the airsegment and the system architecture. The second is a technologicaldemonstrator of an unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV) called Neuron,for which Dassault Aviation has been chosen as the prime contractor.EADS will back Dassault in this programme in the following areas:

Israel is leader of UAVs industry after Yuma Kapor war Israel lost toomany aircraft due to SAM missile batteries in war so they choose,Tadiran and IAI found themselves in bitter competition for militarybattlefield UAV , Israel has 6 UAVs producing comapines (1) IAI(Malat)produce 9 UAVs Model(2)Elbit (Silver Arrow) produce 6 UAVsmodel(3)Aeronautic producing 6 UAVs model(4)EMIT Producing 4model(5)Rafael producing 2 UAVs model (6) Top-Vision Produce 1 UAVSmodel. The Netherlands is not the only nation to employ Israeliunmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in foreign occupation. They are alsoutilized by Canadian, US, UK and Australian forces in Afghanistan andIraq .

(1)IMI Mastiff It was demonstrated to Tadiran and military brass inearly 1974. Tadiran management was sold on the idea and gave Ellis acontract to develop an operational system named "Mastiff .The Israelimilitary began to buy more Mastiffs (2)Top I Vision Casper 250TheCasper 250 is a cost effective solution for Homeland security - lowintensity conflict Day or Night operations. It can be deployed anywherein a very short time, the system operation is simple and the HumanMachine Interface (HMI) is user-friendly. The Casper 250 is alsoequipped with specially patented wing architecture and landing method,which increases significantly its survivability and decreases the LCC(Life Cycle Cost).

(3)Top I Vision Aerostat (4)IAI Pioneer (with the USA) Mazlat and AAIdeveloped the Pioneer, The Pioneer a derivative of the SCOUT, was thefirst UAV System to be purchased by a foreign customer - the US Navy Itis still in operational use. Battle proven during the Gulf War and inBosnia and Iraq

(5)RQ-5 Hunter (with the USA) The Hunter is a heavy tactical UAV systemfor surveillance, reconnaissance, target acquisition, artilleryadjustment and damage assessment. Capable of being upgraded to E-Hunter(Extended Endurance Platform) Capable of carrying multiple payloadssimultaneously

(6)IAI General (7)IAI Harpy The MBD missile division of IAI sellsanother UAV, the "Harpy", which is an antiradar loitering attack drone.It patrols over a battlefield, waiting for somebody to turn on a radar,and then dives into it, destroying it with a blast-fragmentationwarhead. The Harpy is in service with the Israeli Defense Forces, aswell as Turkey, India, China, Taiwan, and the Republic of Korea areusing.

(8)IAI Herod (9)IAI Heron / Machatz-1, reconnaissance Heron TP is anadvanced, multi-puropse MALE UAV system with an extended performanceenvelope and a variety of payloads capability.The Heron TP was designedas a multi-purpose, multi-system platform to address local andinternational customers' needs and to perform a variety of strategicmissions with a high level of reliability, The HERON I is a MediumAltitude Long Endurance (MALE) UAV system for strategic and tacticalmissions

(10)IAI Ranger The Ranger is a tactical UAV system for use in extremeweather conditions for surveillance, reconnaissance, targetacquisition, artillery adjustment and damage assessment. It wasdeveloped and manufactured in cooperation with the Swiss company RUAGAerospace

(11)IAI Scout while IAI came up with a competitor with the appropriatename of "Scout" and sold it to the military as well. The Scout, alsoknown as "Zahavan (Oriole)", had a similar configuration to theMastiff. (12)IAI Searcher The Mastiff and Scout remained in servicewith the Israeli Army until the early 1990s, when they were replaced bythe Malat "Searcher", also known as the "Meyromit (High Flier)".

(13)IAI Skylite - Canister Launched mini-UAV system Skylite A and skylite B Rafael's Skylite is man-portable, canister launched,electrically powered loitering surveillance and reconnaissance platformoffering superior performance, autonomy, availability and flexibilityThe system can operate in difficult weather conditions, including highwinds that weighs 6kg and is 12cm in diameter (14)Eitan (UCAV)

(15)Elbit Hermes 450 Elbit Systems’ Hermes 450 is classed as a MALE(Medium Altitude, Long Endurance) UAV, though it’s smaller thancompetitors like General Atomics’ MQ-1 Predator and Israel AerospaceIndustries’ Heron. The Hermes 450 is best known for serving as thebasis for Britain’s Mk450B Watchkeeper program, which is currentlyEurope’s largest; meanwhile, the standard Mk450 version is serving asan interim contracted UAV with British forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.The Hermes 450 also serves in IsraelThe company also expects totest-fly its Predator-sized Hermes 900 model in late 2008 or early2009, after a delay of almost a year. Hermes 450s are operated by theU.S. Department of Defense Joint Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Test andEvaluation Program at the Naval Air Station Fallon[1], and two Hermes450s were tested by the U.S. Border Patrol in 2004. The Hermes 450 isthe basis of the British Army Watchkeeper WK450 development whichstarted in July 2005 in conjunction with Thales.

(16)Elbit Skylark Elbit’s Skylark-I mini-UAV has become a popularchoice for portable “over the hill” surveillance, as nations likeIsrael, Australia, Canada, France, Mexico, Sweden, et. al. adopt it forbattlefield use Skylark I comes in 2 versions. The standard Skylark Iis launched by hand, The new Skylark I-LE (long endurance) increasesflight time from 1.5 hours to 3 hours, with a mission range “greaterthan 15 km.” The larger Skylark II cannot be launched by hand, like itscounterparts; it must use a rail launcher instead. Skylark II competesin the lower tier of the conventional UAV market, alongside models likeTextron AAI’s RQ-7 Shadow, IAI’s I-View 250, et. al.

(17)Aeronautics Defense Systems - Aerostar Since its introduction in2000, the Aerostar has broken several world records and setunprecedented standards for reliability, life cycle, ease of operation,logistics, endurance, operational range, payload options, groundsystems interfaces, cost-effectiveness, and more. Currently operationalin four continents All modern police forces use fixed wing aircraft andhelicopters to detect traffic violations, pursue criminals and hunt formissing persons. The Aerostar UAV System will be available to supportUS Mexican southern Border Surveillance missions and is currentlydeployed in a number of countries for border surveillance and criticalasset/ force protection

(18)Aeronautics Defense Systems - DominatorThe Dominator MALE UAV is aMulti-mission platform that was designed for Medium Altitude LongEndurance missions. The Dominator UAV system presents extraordinaryendurance, operational flexibility and is suited for operation indifferent climate zones. Capabilities Cruising speed – 90–150 knotsService ceiling – 25,000 feet , Wingspan – 8m Length – 8m

(19)Aeronautics Defense Systems - Aerolight The Aerolight UAV is aclose range and training UAV platform developed and manufactured byAeronautics Defense Systems. It is used for close range ISR missions,training, and testing of experimental payloads. In Addition to aconventional wheeled Take Off & Landing capabilities, The systemcan be launched by a catapult and can be recovered by a precisionPara-foil recovery system. The system is in use by the IsraeliAirForce, the US Navy and additional customers worldwide

(20)Aeronautics Defense Systems - Orbiter The Orbiter Mini UAV SystemIs a compact and lightweight system designed for use in Military andHomeland Security missions. The system presents the ultimate solutionfor Over The Hill reconnaissance missions, Low Intensity Conflicts andUrban warfare operations as well as any close range ISR mission. TheOrbiter System can be transported, assembled, launched and operated byjust two persons after minimal training. The entire Orbiter System fitsinto one backpack and no additional personnel need to befielded.Assembled in less than 10 minutes

(21)EMIT Blue Horizon 2 Fully integrated weapon system capable ofcapturing and reporting intelligence data in real-time and day/nightoperation over a pre-determined target zoneSingapore Technologies hassigned a 814 million contract with Israel’s Emit Aviation Consultancyfor the new Blue Horizon UAV (22)EMIT SparrowThe Sparrow is aretrievable, modestly sized UAV, equipped with an Electro-optical,day/night, stabilized payload. It's advanced avionics provide a fullymanual to fully autonomous flight, combined with surveillance andrecognition capabilities. A typically configured, fully fueled Sparrowweighs approx. 45 Kg, carries a mission specific payload of 12 Kg. andcruises at 60-70 Kts. for over 4hr. The UAV can be fitted with a largerfuel tank to facilitate extended flight duration.

(23)EMIT ButterflyThe butterfly UAV is a Paramotor glider (Paraglider) based UAV.
High payload carrying capacity. Operational simplicity. Logisticalsimplicity. Easy to maintain. Cost effective. Payload day/night electrooptical, up to 230 Kg ,speed 30knots IAS Crews 2 GCS operator, 1launcher/recovery operator

(24) 1-View Malat also developed a smaller UAV known as the "I-View",with fixed landing gear, a pusher propeller, and an inverted-vee tail.Australia placed a large order for I-Views in 2006 but ended upcancelling the contract in 2008. Nobody else seems to have adoptedit.(25) The Bird-Eye 400 and bird eye 600 system is an optimal solutionfor low echelon forces to obtain real time intelligence, independent ofhigher echelon sources. It is Man-portable with fast field deploymentby a team of two

(26) Mosquito The MOSQUITO is a Micro UAV System, providing real-timeimagery data in restricted urban areas. The MOSQUITO carries aminiature video camera. The system offers a fully automated flight withGPS based "in flight" way point control. Missions are planned usingdigital maps referencing and wiewed on a computer monitor.The MOSQUITOis hand or bungee launched and lands on it's belly.

(27)Aero SKY Aerosky is a lightweight tactical UAV (70 kg take-offweight) capable of operating at a range of 100 km sustaining afive-hour mission. Maximum operational altitude is 15,000 feet. Itcarries a 18-kg payload. Aeronautics have developed several lightweight (28) Tail-sitter The Tail-Sitter UAV is a V-TOL platformdeveloped by Aeronautics around 2000. It was designed to perform theunique flight profile of vertical Take-off and Landing, air rotation,and horizontal flight. The Tail-Sitter's flight profile combines theadvantages of taking-off and landing in rough/crowded/field/urbanconditions, and the endurance/range of horizontal flying platforms

The Air Force has put UAVs on top of its wish list. Next year, 52 of the 93 aircraft the Air Force will purchase are unmanned.

Likewise, the demand for pilots and sensor operators grows as the AirForce looks to establish 50 Predator and Reaper orbits —round-the-clock combat air patrols — by 2012. That’s an increase of 17orbits from the Air Force’s current total, which will require 1,100crews of one pilot and one sensor operator. The service now has 474crews, according to Air Combat Command.
Two officer pilots and four enlisted sensor operators sit in theMulti-Aircraft Control system — referred to as the MAC — which can flyup to four missions at a time.

By 2016, the Air Force wants to have 50 orbits — round-the-clock combatair patrols — flown solely by the MQ-9 Reaper, the highly lethalunmanned aerial vehicle. the Air Force flies 33 combat air patrols inIraq and Afghanistan; 31 of those are Predators, two are Reapers

During the first six months of 2008, Air Force planes dropped 1,853bombs over Afghanistan — more than were dropped in all of 2006. Lastmonth, they dropped 505 bombs over Afghanistan, while Air Force planesdropped only 29 bombs over Iraq.

UAVs are starting to replace spy satellites in the major espionageagencies. The CIA has long had its own fleet of Predator UAVs, and nowthe NGA (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which analyses stuff,makes maps, and the like) and NRO (National Reconnaissance Office,which builds and operates spy satellites) want more UAVs as well. Thesudden NRO enthusiasm for UAVs. Places like Afghanistan and Iraq, UAVsare cheaper, and more useful, than satellites

The skillful employment of US Air Force, Army, and Naval air power (toinclude greatly expanded use of armed and reconnaissance UAV’s :Predator, Reaper, Global hawk, and Shadow) has narrowly prevented theTaliban from massing and achieving local tactical
Victories over isolated and outnumbered US and coalition forces in the East and South.

Posted in , | 1 Comment
Powered by Blogger.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Search

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark. Converted by LiteThemes.com.